Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 3,120
Brockman v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
J Cabell Brockman
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Jermain Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109 - Federal Railroad Safety Act
United States of America v. Moses et al
as 2:2023mc04007
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Yolanda Moses
Garnishee:
Rheem Manufacturing Company
Holt v. Pinnacle Recovery Inc
as 5:2023cv00998
Plaintiff:
Lisa Holt
Defendant:
Pinnacle Recovery Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Barber v. Medical Data Systems Inc
as 4:2023cv00974
Plaintiff:
Gregory Barber
Defendant:
Medical Data Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dyer v. Capital One
as 5:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
Michael Joe Dyer, Jr.
Defendant:
Capital One
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bolling-Carlisle v. Knight Adjustment Bureau Inc
as 4:2023cv00970
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bolling-Carlisle
Defendant:
Knight Adjustment Bureau Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bolling-Carlisle v. US Collections West Inc
as 4:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bolling-Carlisle
Defendant:
US Collections West Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ball v. Kingston Data and Credit International Inc
as 5:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ball
Defendant:
Kingston Data and Credit International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ball v. Kingston Data and Credit International Inc
as 5:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Donovan Ball
Defendant:
Kingston Data and Credit International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sharp v. Vance and Huffman LLC
as 4:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sharp
Defendant:
Vance and Huffman LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
