US District Court for the District of Alaska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 518
James v. Meritt et al
as 3:2024cv00156
Defendant:
Trey Tayler and Doug Meritt
Plaintiff:
Abraham James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abruska v. D.O.C. Alaska Medical Malpractice
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mattfi Abruska
Defendant:
D.O.C. Alaska Medical Malpractice
Shirley v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Clarence C. Shirley, III
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Katchatag v. Dahlstrom et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Katchatag
Defendant:
Nancy Dahlstrom, Jeremy Hough, A. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Costigan v. State of Alaska Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00111
Defendant:
State of Alaska Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Samson Slade Costigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard
Defendant:
Collado Scarborough, Sarah Angol, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tholson v. Luper
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Leon M. Tholson
Defendant:
D. Luper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornette v. Altepeter et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas Cornette
Defendant:
L. Altepeter, N. Sailer and Matt Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
James v. Mun et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Paul R. James, Jr.
Defendant:
Mun, Wassilie and Kargass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Cockrell et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
James Cockrell, Andrew Gault, Richard Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
