U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 232
Nibbelink Masonry Construction Corporation v. R A L Investment Corporation dba Silverstrand Construction et al
as 2:2025cv04924
Petitioner:
Nibbelink Masonry Construction Corporation
Defendant:
R A L Investment Corporation dba Silverstrand Construction and The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. Ral Investment Corporation et al
as 2:2025cv04774
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Pacific Restoration Group, Inc.
Defendant:
RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION doing business as SILVERSTRAND CONSTRUCTION, a California corporation and THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, a New Hampshire corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Pacfic Restoration Group, Inc. et al RAL Investment Corporation et al
as 2:2025cv04380
Petitioner:
United States of America, for the use and benefit of PACIFIC RESTORATION GROUP, INC., a California corporation
Defendant:
RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION doing business as SILVERSTRAND CONSTRUCTION, a California corporation and THE HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, a New Hampshire corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Taft Electric Company v. Herman Construction Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv03171
Defendant:
Western Surety Company, Herman Construction Group, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Taft Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Wirewrangler, LLC v. Sealaska Constructors, LLC et al
as 2:2025cv03172
Plaintiff:
Wirewrangler, LLC United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Wirewrangler LLC doing business as TW Power LInte Construction
Defendant:
Sealaska Constructors, LLC and Berkley Insurance Company
Cross-Defendant:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cross-Plaintiff:
Sealaska Constructors, LLC
Counter-Claimant:
Sealaska Constructors, LLC
Counter-Defendant:
Wirewrangler, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Universal Electronic Alarms, Inc. v. The Hanover Insurance Company
as 2:2025cv01181
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Universal Electronic Alarms, Inc.
Defendant:
The Hanover Insurance Company doing business as Silverstrand Construction and Ral Investment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
BC3 Equipment Inc. v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company et al
as 2:2025cv00027
Defendant:
Harco National Insurance Company, CLAUSS CONSTRUCTION, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
BC3 Equipment Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Walters Wholesale Electric Co. v. Advanced Electrical Technologies, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv02028
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Gilbane Federal, Robert M. Brock and others
Cross-Complainant:
Gilbane Federal
Cross-Defendant:
Advanced Electrical Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Walters Wholesale Electric Co.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
PGC Construction, Inc. v. Ral Investment Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv01810
Defendant:
Ral Investment Corporation a California corporation doing business as Silverstrand Construction a division of Ral Investment Corporation doing business as Silverstrand Specialties, The Hanover Insurance Company and Does 1-100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
PGC Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv07140
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50, inclusive, McCarthy Building Compaines, Inc., Federal Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cross-Plaintiff:
McCarthy Building Compaines, Inc.
Cross-Defendant:
The Elevator Company and Argonaut Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
