US District Court for the Central District of California Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 220
United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing, Inc. et al v. Allstate Engineering et al
as 2:2021cv08112
Plaintiff:
United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing, Inc., A Washington Corporation and United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing
Defendant:
Allstate Engineering, a California corporation, The Gray Insurance Company, Bond No. GSA9900021, DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
United States of America, et al v. West Point Contractors, Inc., et al
as 2:2021cv07957
Plaintiff:
United States of America, for the use and benefit of: R.C. Becker and Son, Inc., a California corporation, United States of America and R.C. Becker and Son, Inc.
Defendant:
West Point Contractors, Inc., a California corporation, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, a Connecticut corporation, West Point Contractors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hylkema Roofing, Inc. v. Souza Construction, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv03863
Defendant:
Souza Construction, Inc, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, a Connecticut corporation, AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a California corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Hylkema Roofing, Inc. and Hylkema Roofing, Inc. United States for the use of Hylkema Roofing, Inc., a California corporation doing business as Superior Roofing
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Elite Earthworks and Engineering v. De La Fuente Construction, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00110
Defendant:
De La Fuente Construction, Inc., a California corporation, Suretec Insurance Company, a Texas corporation, Suretec Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Elite Earthworks & Engineering, a California corporation and Elite Earthworks and Engineering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
United States for the Use and Benefit of W & J Lazaro Inc. v. Lifecycle Construction Services, LLC, et al
as 5:2021cv00037
Defendant:
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc., Lifecycle Construction Services, LLC and Does 1 to 10
Plaintiff:
United States for the Use and Benefit of W & J Lazaro Inc. a California corporation doing business as Alexis Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Acme Automation Corporation v. Whitehorn Construction Company et al
as 5:2020cv02635
Plaintiff:
Acme Automation Corporation and United States for the Use and the Benefit of Acme Automation Corporation
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Whitehorn Construction Company and Whitehorn Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Reyes Construction, Inc. v. D. P. Industries, Inc.
as 2:2020cv08661
Defendant:
D. P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corportion, D. P. Industries, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Reyes Construction, Inc., a California corporation and Reyes Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Reyes Construction, Inc. v. D. P. Industries, Inc.
as 8:2020cv01837
Plaintiff:
Reyes Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
D. P. Industries, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
D.P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation v. Reyes Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv07916
Petitioner:
Zurich American Insurance Company A New York corporation, Reyes Construction, Inc., a California corporation, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the Use and Benefit of D. P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation and others
Plaintiff:
D.P. Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Company and Reyes Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
RMC Construction and Roofing, Inc. v. I.E. Pacific, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03865
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America, I.E.-Pacific, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Plaintiff:
United States For the Use of RMC Construction & Roofing, Inc. and RMC Construction and Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
