US District Court for the Central District of California Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18,283
Kathleen Burckhardt v. Carolyn Colvin
as 8:2025cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Burckhardt
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Amesquita v. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2025cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jose Amesquita
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Wright v. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2025cv00169
Plaintiff:
Lamon Wright
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez v. Social Security
as 2:2025cv00575
Plaintiff:
Rafael Alcantara Rodriguez
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Santiago v. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2025cv00159
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Simeon Santiago, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00446
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Esquibel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00492
Plaintiff:
Joseph Esquibel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rachel Christina Castillo v. Carolyn Colvin
as 2:2025cv00413
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Luest v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00434
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Rosanna Stong v. Carolyn Colvin
as 2:2025cv00374
Plaintiff:
Rosanna Stong
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
