US District Court for the Central District of California Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 84,748
THE MASYC GROUP, INC. v. Lam et al
as 2:2024cv03900
Plaintiff: THE MASYC GROUP, INC.
Defendant: Jonathan Lam, Kelley Keyes, Greg Demmelmaier and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03899
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Navarro v. EXP Realty of California, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03880
Plaintiff: Carolyn Navarro
Defendant: EXP Realty of California, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Stricker v. Centr, LLC
as 2:2024cv03877
Plaintiff: Glenn Stricker
Defendant: Centr, LLC
Donnell G. Haddock v. Luna et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00639
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humbl, Inc. v. Pacific Lion LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01009
Plaintiff: Humbl, Inc.
Defendant: Pacific Lion LLC, Jacob Fernane and Robert Hymers, III
Yu v. GARLAND et al
as 8:2024cv01016
Plaintiff: Min Yu
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND, Alexandro N Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Oregon v. GardaWorld CashLink LLC
as 2:2024cv03862
Plaintiff: Rodrigo Pena Oregon
Defendant: GardaWorld CashLink LLC doing business as GardaWorld Cash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Zhang et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 8:2024cv01015
Plaintiff: Liqiang Zhang
Petitioner: MERRICK GARLAND
Defendant: AJELANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M. JADDOU and David Radel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
EFL Global LLC v. California Sierra Express, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03856
Plaintiff: EFL Global LLC
Defendant: California Sierra Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?