US District Court for the Central District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 24,135
Irving Aguilar-Calixto v. Thomas Tyler
as 8:2024cv00596
Petitioner:
Irving Aguilar-Calixto
Respondent:
Thomas Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adrian Solorio v. C. Pfeiffer
as 8:2024cv00574
Petitioner:
Adrian Solorio
Respondent:
C. Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Wayne Grogan v. People of The State of California
as 2:2024cv02158
Petitioner:
Daniel Grogan
Respondent:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberto Herrera v. CDCR Staff
as 2:2024cv02241
Petitioner:
Roberto Herrera
Respondent:
CDCR Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walter Reginald Beasley, Jr. v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
Walter Reginald Beasley, Jr.
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eugene William Hillman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00586
Petitioner:
Eugene William Hillman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whipple v. Warden
as 2:2024cv02269
Petitioner:
Lori Whipple
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keenan George v. Tent Allen
as 2:2024cv02096
Petitioner:
Keenan George
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe Lewis Valentine v. F. Guzman
as 2:2024cv02127
Petitioner:
Joe Lewis Valentine
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillip Camillo-Amisano v. J. Engleman
as 2:2024cv02064
Petitioner:
Phillip Camillo-Amisano
Respondent:
Warden J. Engleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
