US District Court for the Eastern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 347
Williford v. Scrivner
as 2:2015cv00892
Plaintiff:
Richard Williford
Defendant:
Zach Scrivner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Sanders v. Matthew et al
as 1:2015cv00395
Plaintiff:
Phillip Sanders
Defendant:
Matthew, Sturgeon, Sabrina Ashjian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barcus v. CIA
as 2:2014cv02723
Plaintiff:
Kody Logan Barcus
Defendant:
CIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Vermeulen v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2014at00762
Plaintiff:
Dirk Vermeulen
Defendant:
Lester Jenkins and Warren Bradford
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Vermeulen v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2014at00761
Plaintiff:
Dirk Vermeulen
Defendant:
Lester Jenkins and Warren Bradford
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
v. Bradford
as 1:2014at00760
Defendant:
Warren Bradford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Association of American Railroads et al v. California Office of Spill Prevention and Response et al
as 2:2014at01262
Plaintiff:
Association of American Railroads, Union Pacific Railroad Company and BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
California Office of Spill Prevention and Response, Thomas M. Cullen, Jr. and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Association of American Railroads et al v. California Office of Spill Prevention and Response et al
as 2:2014cv02354
Plaintiff:
Association of American Railroads , Union Pacific Railroad Company and BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
California Office of Spill Prevention and Response , Thomas M. Cullen, Jr. and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Van Dyke et al
as 2:2014at01003
Defendant:
Victor Van Dyke and Terry A Meistering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Trustmark National Bank v. Van Dyke, et al
as 2:2014cv01891
Defendant:
Victor Van Dyke and Terry A Meistering
Plaintiff:
Trustmark National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
