US District Court for the Eastern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 25,044
(PC) Ellis v. El Dorado County Probation Department
as 2:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Peter Ellis
Defendant:
El Dorado County Probation Department and El Dorado County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rollen v. Hicks
as 2:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Van Keyshone Rollen
Defendant:
A. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Alford v. Pheiffer et al
as 2:2024cv01290
Plaintiff:
Larry Alford
Defendant:
Christian Pheiffer, R. Pantoja, J. Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Martinez, Jr. v. Pogue et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Joe Martinez, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyson Pogue, Jason Quick, Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Mandrigal et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Maurice Daronte Davis
Defendant:
Z. Mandrigal, T. Harris, Hamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Scott v. Padilla
as 2:2024cv01297
Plaintiff:
Jamurl A. Scott
Defendant:
Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dauwalder v. Atherton et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dauwalder
Defendant:
J. Atherton, J. Perez, Rostislav Davydov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayburne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B. Powell, S. Arana and D. Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Azpera v. Campos et al
as 2:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Azpera
Defendant:
J. Campos and G. Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
