US District Court for the Eastern District of California Labor Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 4,236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Gaefcke v. Flatiron West, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
James Gaefcke
Defendant:
Flatiron West, Inc. a Delaware Corporation Doing business as Flatiron, Inc., Flatiron Construction Corp., Dragados USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gaefcke v. Flatiron West, Inc. dba Flatiron Constructors Inc. et al
as 1:2023at00885
Plaintiff:
James Gaefcke
Defendant:
Flatiron West, Inc. dba Flatiron Constructors Inc., Flatiron Construction Corp., Dragados USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Kyler v. Aetna Health of California, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02303
Plaintiff:
Drew Kyler
Defendant:
Aetna Health of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez v. California Dairies, Inc.
as 1:2023at00866
Plaintiff:
Luis J. Ferrer Gonzalez
Defendant:
California Dairies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Kyler v. Aetna Health of California, Inc.
as 2:2023at01031
Plaintiff:
Drew Kyler
Defendant:
Aetna Health of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez v. California Dairies, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Luis J. Ferrer Gonzalez
Defendant:
California Dairies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Local Union 343 v. G.A.R. Plumbing Partners, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02282
Petitioner:
Local Union 343 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada
Respondent:
G.A.R. Plumbing Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.