US District Court for the Northern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 2,278
LR Trust v. McKinnon et al
as 3:2022cv08627
Plaintiff:
LR Trust
Defendant:
Todd McKinnon, J. Frederic Kerrest, Shellye Archambeau and others
Peters v. Twist Bioscience Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv08168
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Peters
Defendant:
Twist Bioscience Corporation, Emily M. Leproust and James M. Thorburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Kusnier v. Affirm Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07770
Plaintiff:
Mark Kusnier
Defendant:
Affirm Holdings, Inc., Max Levchin and Michael Linford
Houghton et al v. Leshner et al
as 3:2022cv07781
Plaintiff:
Amanda Houghton, Charles Douglas and Susan Franklin
Defendant:
Robert Leshner, Geoffrey Hayes, Compound DAO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Gould
as 4:2022cv07671
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Alexander S Gould
Glanville v. Usertesting, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07568
Plaintiff:
Alex Glanville
Defendant:
Usertesting, Inc., Andy Macmillan, Darrell Benatar and others
O'Dell v. McKinnon et al
as 3:2022cv07480
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Todd McKinnon, Brett Tighe, Frederic Kerrest and others
Not Classified By Court:
OKTA, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Movva v. Riccitiello et al
as 5:2022cv07416
Plaintiff:
Krishna Movva and Tom Duong
Defendant:
John S. Riccitiello, Kimberly Jabal, Luis Felipe Visoso and others
Da Camara v. Poshmark, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07379
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Da Camara
Defendant:
Poshmark, Inc., Manish Chandra, Navin Chaddha and others
O'Dell v. McKinnon et al
as 3:2022cv07434
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Todd McKinnon, Brett Tighe, Frederic Kerrest and others
Not Classified By Court:
Okta, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
