US District Court for the Northern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 211 - 220 of 2,292
Felipe v. Playstudios, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02164
Plaintiff:
Christian A. Felipe
Defendant:
Playstudios, Inc. and Andrew Pascal
Hardy v. Embark Technology, Inc. f/k/a Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II et al
as 3:2022cv02090
Plaintiff:
Tyler Hardy
Defendant:
Embark Technology, Inc. f/k/a Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II, Ian Robertson, Ken Manget and others
Mangino v. Lucid Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02094
Plaintiff:
Victor W. Mangino
Defendant:
Lucid Group, Inc., Peter Rawlinson and Sherry House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Whitcomb v. Affirm Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02099
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitcomb
Defendant:
Affirm Holdings, Inc., Max Levchin and Michael Linford
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Toole
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Romero
as 3:2022cv02067
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Manuel A Romero and Manuel A. Romero
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Kampe v. Volta Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv02055
Plaintiff:
Karoline Kampe
Defendant:
Volta Inc., Scott Mercer and Francois P. Chadwick
Robinson v. Rosensweig et al
as 5:2022cv02049
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robinson
Defendant:
Daniel L. Rosensweig, Andrew J. Brown, Nathan Schultz and others
Morris v. Raab et al
as 3:2022cv01988
Plaintiff:
Sean Morris
Defendant:
Michael Raab, Justin Renz, Robert Bazemore and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sure et al
as 4:2022cv01967
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Hari Prasad Sure, Lokesh Lagudu, Chotu Prabhu Tej Pulagam and others
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
