US District Court for the Southern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,599
Stark v. Dream Stays SD, LLC
as 3:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
Collette Stark
Defendant:
Dream Stays SD, LLC
Stark v. Navigate Real Estate Co.
as 3:2023cv02166
Plaintiff:
Collette Stark
Defendant:
Navigate Real Estate Co.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Ewing v. Camus et al
as 3:2023cv02154
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Pablo Garces Camus and Dboss Funding, LLC
Ewing v. Isaac et al
as 3:2023cv02127
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Isaam Isaac and Fun in the Sun Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Marin v. Viernes et al
as 3:2023cv02118
Defendant:
Zhongguo Nanxing Doe Unknown Chinese Supplier, Corporate Entity Owned and/or Controlled by its Alter Ego the people's Republic of China (Zhongguo) also known as Zhong Fu Doe doing business as Friday Goods, Marvin Viernes, Zhong Fu Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Mel Marin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Williams v. Upgrade, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02084
Plaintiff:
Darcy Williams
Defendant:
Upgrade, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
