U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,134
In Re Ex Parte Application of HMD Global Oy for an Order under 28 USC 1782 to obtain discovery for use in foreign proceedings
as 3:2024mc02144
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Langley v. American Express National Bank
as 3:2025cv01304
Plaintiff:
Kevan Langley
Defendant:
American Express National Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Perkins v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 3:2025cv01305
Plaintiff:
Valerie Perkins
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Esquivel v. Insurance Zebra Inc.
as 3:2025cv01282
Plaintiff:
Joe Esquivel
Defendant:
Insurance Zebra Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Providence Teachers Union v. PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2025cv01238
Plaintiff:
Providence Teachers Union
Defendant:
PowerSchool Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Buksbaum et al v. Corelle Brands LLC
as 3:2025cv01247
Plaintiff:
Sharyn Buksbaum and Courtney Herman
Defendant:
Corelle Brands LLC doing business as Instant Pot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Scales v. Gurstel Law Firm, P.C.
as 3:2025cv01229
Plaintiff:
Kimiko Scales
Defendant:
Gurstel Law Firm, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Corona v. Raw Sugar, LLC et al
as 3:2025cv01222
Plaintiff:
Maria Corona
Defendant:
Raw Sugar, LLC and Sugar Buyer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
