US District Court for the Southern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,762
Shammam v. American Honda Finance Corporation
as 3:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Quintin Shammam
Defendant:
American Honda Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shallowhorn v. Lopez et al
as 3:2023cv01273
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Waterbury v. LoanDepot.com, LLC
as 3:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Steven Waterbury
Defendant:
LoanDepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Castello v. Quinstreet Pl, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Michelle Castello
Defendant:
Quinstreet Pl, Inc. doing business as Amone
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dadisho v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 3:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Edmond Dadisho
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 fi Freedom of Information Act
CitySwitch - II-A, LLC v. County of Imperial, California et al
as 3:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
CitySwitch - II-A, LLC
Defendant:
County of Imperial, California and Imperial County Planning Commission
Ewing v. Murphy et al
as 3:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
John Anthony Murphy and Polaris Rental Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Qsar et al
as 3:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jordan Qsar, Grant Witherspoon, Austin Bernard and others
San Diego Composites, Inc. v. Cabales et al
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
San Diego Composites, Inc. doing business as Applied Composites
Defendant:
Raymund Cabales, Dynovas, Inc. and Does 1-10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
