California Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 822
United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing, Inc., A Washington Corporation v. Allstate Engineering, a California corporation et al
as 2:2021cv08112
Plaintiff: United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Queen City Sheet Metal and Roofing, Inc., A Washington Corporation
Defendant: Allstate Engineering, a California corporation, The Gray Insurance Company, Bond No. GSA9900021 and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, et al v. West Point Contractors, Inc., et al
as 2:2021cv07957
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of: R.C. Becker and Son, Inc., a California corporation
Defendant: West Point Contractors, Inc., a California corporation and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, a Connecticut corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Miller Act
Prime Mechanical Service, Inc. v. W.E. Lyons Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv07303
Plaintiff: Prime Mechanical Service, Inc.
Defendant: W.E. Lyons Construction, Inc., Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Coastline Steel and Construction, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01449
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Coastline Steel and Construction, Inc.
Defendant: K.O.O. Construction, Inc., Great American Insurance Company and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Pace Supply Corp. v. Patriot Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2021at00657
Plaintiff: Pace Supply Corp.
Defendant: Patriot Construction, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Pace Supply Corp. v. Patriot Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01278
Plaintiff: Pace Supply Corp.
Defendant: Patriot Construction, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Bergelectric Corp., and Bergelectric Corp., v. A&D GC, Inc., et al
as 5:2021cv04718
Defendant: UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, A&D GC, INC., a California corporation, DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive and others
Plaintiff: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of BERGELECTRIC CORP., a California corporation; and BERGELECTRIC CORP., a California corporation, The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Bergelectric Corp., and Bergelectric Corp.
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Rexel USA, Inc. v. Souza Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00964
Defendant: Arthur F. Gallagher & Co. Insurance Brokers of California Inc., Brac Electric, Inc., Does 1 through 30 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Rexel USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Type: Contract Miller Act
Sustainable Modular Mgt., Inc. v. Arch Ins. Co.
as 2:2021cv00904
Defendant: Arch Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Sustainable Modular Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Hylkema Roofing, Inc. v. Souza Construction, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03863
Defendant: Souza Construction, Inc, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, a Connecticut corporation, AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a California corporation and others
Plaintiff: Hylkema Roofing, Inc. and Hylkema Roofing, Inc. United States for the use of Hylkema Roofing, Inc., a California corporation doing business as Superior Roofing
Cause Of Action: Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?