California Social Security Cases

Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 36,974
Gomes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025at00004
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Kenneth Matthew Gomes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
(SS) Gomes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00023
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Kenneth Matthew Gomes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Moreno v. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2025cv00001
Plaintiff: Flora Inez Moreno
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gilbert v. Colvin
as 3:2024cv02493
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Plaintiff: DeShangela Laura Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Christopher Lemon Crosby v. Carolyn Colvin
as 5:2024cv02738
Plaintiff: Christopher Lemon Crosby
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Elizabeth Rensin v. Carolyn Colvin
as 5:2024cv02739
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Rensin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. Colvin
as 5:2024cv09503
Plaintiff: Mark D. Anderson
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Corhn v. Colvin
as 3:2024cv09473
Plaintiff: Cecil Corhn
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Spencer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv09499
Plaintiff: Mark Spencer
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Norgard v. Colvin
as 3:2024cv02491
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Plaintiff: Constance Marie Norgard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?