California Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 50
T.A.E. et al v. Michelle Spirtos et al
as 5:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
I. E., T. A. E. and Riverside County DPSS-CPS
Defendant:
Jon Eardley and Michelle Spirtos
Viorel Muresan v. James J Rodriguez et al
as 2:2012cv04138
Plaintiff:
Viorel Muresan
Defendant:
James J Rodriguez, Marlene S Rodriguez and The Law Firm of Dennis P. Block and Associates
Driscoll v. Harris et al
as 3:2011cv01789
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Driscoll
Defendant:
Pamela Harris , James A. Nesom , Employment Development Department for State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Duane Harris v. Phillip L Browning
as 2:2010cv07964
Defendant:
Director Phillip L. Browning
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Chaffon v. AAA Tech Support et al
as 3:2010cv02918
Plaintiff:
Burgundy Chaffon
Defendant:
AAA Tech Support and Huey Mach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. West
as 3:2010cv01154
Plaintiff:
Imelda Garcia
Defendant:
Christopher Blake West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fred v. Washoe Tribe
as 2:2010cv00845
Plaintiff:
Ronda Whiterock Fred
Defendant:
Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Michael Duane Harris v. John A. Wagner et al
as 2:2010cv02378
Defendant:
Director Phillip L. Browning and Director John A. Wagner
Grow), GA43(G.R) (Los Angeles County Dept. Of Public And Social Service: Civic Center Dist:
Mrs Phan
Wade v. Contra Costa Community College District et al
as 3:2009cv05959
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Contra Costa Community College District, Diablo Valley College, Christine Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
V. et al v. Wagner et al
as 4:2009cv04668
Plaintiff:
David Oster, David Oster, David Oster and others
Defendant:
John Wagner, John Wagner, John Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
