US District Court for the District of Connecticut Other Statutes Cases

Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 7,199
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Murphy et al
as 3:2023cv01621
Plaintiff: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Justin Murphy and Mara Investments LLC
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Komarow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01599
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Andrew M. Komarow
Spinner v. Acunto
as 3:2023mc00113
Plaintiff: Paul J. Spinner
Defendant: John Acunto and Adsouth, Inc.
In re: Application for Civil Seizure Warrants
as 3:2023mc00111
In Re: Application for Civil Seizure Warrants
Petitioner: USA
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, et al v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 677
as 3:2023mc00114
Plaintiff: Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant: International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 677
Fields v. Syrian Arab Rebublic
as 3:2023mc00109
Plaintiff: Tamara Fields
Defendant: Syrian Arab Rebublic
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Highrise Advantage, LLC et al
as 3:2023mc00110
Plaintiff: Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant: Highrise Advantage, LLC, Bull Run Advantage, Green Knight Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01580
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
In Re: JAMP Pharma Corporation
as 3:2023mc00108
In Re: JAMP Pharma Corporation
Not Classified By Court: Leo John Seman, Danping Li and Rolf Grempler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01573
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?