US District Court for the District of Connecticut Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 164
USA v. $25,700.00 et al
as 3:2008cv00537
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
$25,700.00
Claimant:
Erlind Latifi
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 4 Audemars Piguet et al
as 3:2008cv00300
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
4 Audemars Piguet and 2 Glashutte Original
Claimant:
Jeffrey Grous
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. US Currency et al
as 3:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$50,000 US Currency
Claimant:
John Doucet
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. $19,163.18 et al
as 3:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
$19,163.18, $20,171.77, $20,681.52 and others
Claimant:
Gurdev Kaura and Kulwinder Kaura
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. One Olevia 32 Inch LCD TV et al
as 3:2007cv01805
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
One Olevia 32 Inch LCD TV, Emachine T3504, One HP Pavilion ZE4900 and others
Claimant:
Juan A. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. $254,271.35, Currency, US
as 3:2007cv01792
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$254,271.35 Currency, US
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
USA v. $10,00 0 Currency, US et al
as 3:2007cv01485
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$10,00 0 Currency, US
Claimant:
Paul Huynh
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. 22 Boxes et al
as 3:2007cv01337
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
22 Boxes
Claimant:
William Terry
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. $6,130 et al
as 3:2007cv00636
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
$6,130
Claimant:
Wai Lim William Lam
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. Race Point, M/V et al
as 3:2007cv00450
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Race Point, M/V and Munnatawket, M/V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
