Connecticut Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 887
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv01626
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
SCS Direct, Inc v. Seasons USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01594
Plaintiff:
SCS Direct, Inc. doing business as River Colony Trading
Defendant:
Seasons USA, Inc. and Seasons (HK) LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv01418
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv01417
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Arthur H. Howland & Associates, P.C. v. GRA Equities, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01364
Plaintiff:
Arthur H. Howland & Associates, P.C.
Defendant:
GRA Equities, LLC, Gary Romaniello, 47 Poplar Owner LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Arthur A. Howland & Associates, P.C. v. GRA Equities, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01356
Plaintiff:
Arthur A. Howland & Associates, P.C.
Defendant:
GRA Equities, LLC, Gary Romaniello, 47 Poplar Owner LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv01279
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv01285
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv01281
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv01283
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
