Connecticut Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 887
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
August Image LLC v. Polyperchon LLC
as 3:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
AUGUST IMAGE LLC
Defendant:
POLYPERCHON LLC d/b/a FilmBook, and Polyperchon LLC doing business as FilmBook
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hoffman v. U.S. Postal Service
as 3:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
James B. Hoffman doing business as Hoffman Engineering Consultants
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Johnson v. Preston Family Property Maintenance LLC
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Preston Family Property Maintenance LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Mango v. Second Foundation Partners, LLC
as 3:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Gregory P. Mango
Defendant:
Second Foundation Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Costa et al v. Herbert et al
as 3:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jason Costa, Philip Labonte and Michael Martin
Defendant:
Elizabeth Herbert and Concord Music Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv01627
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv01628
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
