Delaware Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 786
Mendez v. Doe et al.
as 1:2012cv01665
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcox v. Med Staff/Tommy
as 1:2012cv01376
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Wilcox
Defendant:
Med Staff/Tommy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv01312
Plaintiff:
Curtis G. Elliott
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, James Welch, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Correct Care Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01311
Plaintiff:
Darrell Trotter
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC, D. Squires and Sam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drumgo v. Radcliff et al
as 1:2012cv01204
Plaintiff:
De Shawn Drumgo
Defendant:
Radcliff, Enoch Tunamah, Syrita Benson/Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. McMahon et al
as 1:2012cv01171
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Thornton
Defendant:
Michael McMahon, Perry Phelps, G. R. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Pierce et al
as 1:2012cv01155
Plaintiff:
Marvin T. Burton
Defendant:
Pierce, Matthew Dutton and Ihoma Chuks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desmond et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Mafidh as Salafi, Christopher Desmond, Idris Young and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv01079
Plaintiff:
David Benson
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, G.R. Johnson and Martin J. Cosgrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. C.W.M.O.T.O.C.O. et al
as 1:2012cv01059
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
C.W.M.O.T.O.C.O., C.W.M., State of Delaware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
