US District Court for the District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,003
MOORE v. 1st Preference Mortgage Corp.
as 1:2024cv02612
Plaintiff:
Keith F MOORE
Defendant:
1st Preference Mortgage Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
CRUM v. CSOSA et al
as 1:2024cv02564
Defendant:
MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN SECURITY, CSOSA and U.S. ATTORNEY FOR DC
Plaintiff:
DAVID CRUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
BROWN v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv02538
Defendant:
AHLAM KEISSANI and FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
EON BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUDAH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv02528
Plaintiff:
AQUIL SUDAH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DC SUPERIOR COURT, MAYOR MURIEL BOWSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REX v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024cv02605
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN J. REX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv02511
Plaintiff:
JAMIE DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
NICHOLAS v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv02530
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, JOSEPH BIDEN and LLOYD JAMES AUSTIN, III
Plaintiff:
JASON B. NICHOLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CALZADA v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv02477
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS and ROBERT J. CONRAD
Plaintiff:
OMAR JOSE CALZADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SUCEDO-CHAVEZ v. WHASHO COUNTY
as 1:2024cv02482
Plaintiff:
ADEMAR SUCEDO-CHAVEZ
Defendant:
WHASHO COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JAIYEOLA v. NEFF et al
as 1:2024cv02550
Defendant:
SALLY J. BERENS and JANET T. NEFF
Plaintiff:
GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
