District of Columbia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,489
AGARWAL v. CENTRAL ISLAND HEALTHCARE
as 1:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
RANJANA AGARWAL
Defendant:
CENTRAL ISLAND HEALTHCARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BOSER v. KERAMATI et al
as 1:2022cv00513
Plaintiff:
ULRICH BOSER
Defendant:
MARJAN KERAMATI, D.O., VISIONWORKS, INC. and MARJAN KERAMATI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
FLORES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv02756
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
ROSALIE C. FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GABRIEL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv02753
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
DEBRA E. GABRIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv02749
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
LORA PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DACUS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv02746
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA DACUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FELTNER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv02755
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JOAN FELTNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAISLIP v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv02757
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JANIE HAISLIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
