District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 8,185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01670
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv01620
Defendant: GREGORY T. MONAHAN, JOHN POES (1-100), WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Plaintiff: RYAN ROTH
Not Classified By Court: JAMES C. MCCONVILLE
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
ROTH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01622
Defendant: GREGORY T. MONAHAN, WILLIAM J. WALKER, JAMES C. MCCONVILLE and others
Plaintiff: RYAN ROTH
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
JORDAN v. GANT et al
as 1:2020cv01632
Plaintiff: CONSUELO JORDAN
Defendant: ROBIN GANT, DEMOND TIGGS, SHEILA STOKES and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01607
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
MORAVETZ v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2020cv01602
Plaintiff: ALAN JOHN MORAVETZ
Defendant: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01629
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv01590
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III
Plaintiff: GIORGI RTFKHILADZE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RTSKHILADZE v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2020cv01591
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III
Plaintiff: GIORGI RTSKHILADZE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
PORTNOV v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01611
Defendant: DEBORAH A. BYNUM, JOSEPH H. HUNT, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR. and others
Plaintiff: ABRAHAM PORTNOV
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?