District Court Cases in District of Columbia
Cases 101 - 110 of 57,274
ROSEBAR et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE ROSEBAR and ERIC M. ROSEBAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALVIN GROSS, FORTY ACRES REALTY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
GAMEZ SORTO v. G AND G INVESTMENTS, INC. et al.
as 1:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
DORIS GAMEZ SORTO
Defendant:
G AND G INVESTMENTS, INC. D/B/A TRIO BISTRO and MOURAD BENJELLOUN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Hodings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. v. ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. et al
as 1:2024mc00049
Petitioner:
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.
Respondent:
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. v. ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. et al
as 1:2024mc00050
Petitioner:
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.
Respondent:
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
