US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 396,664
O'BRIEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Chad L O'Brien
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
SUCHANEK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2024cv00368
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SUCHANEK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIEBEN v. HURLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and GEORGE HURLEY
Plaintiff:
BRYAN SIEBEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MORRIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00125
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
REBECCA MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
ASHIMINE v. BROWN
as 3:2024cv00336
Defendant:
STANLEY PAUL BROWN
Plaintiff:
NAOMI ASHIMINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PLATT v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Incorporated and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
Louis E Platt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BELLAMY v. SMITH et al
as 5:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
SHAVONNE BELLAMY
Defendant:
AIRBNB, INC. and JAMES L SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wright v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00328
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Erica Wright
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Wright v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00329
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Erica Wright
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
WRIGHT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Erica Wright
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.