US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 14,081
RINKINS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J RINKINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIAZ v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
REINALDO DIAZ
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GALINDO v. GORMAN
as 4:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
LAZARO HELIBERTO GALINDO
Defendant:
OFFICER GORMAN and GORMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. BASFORD
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant:
JOSEPH BASFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYNN v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
HENRY LYNN
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. DAWSON et al
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
VJ DAWSON, OFFICER L JACKSON, T SMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. LAKE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
LAKE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, PATRICK MAHONEY, DADE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, HERNANDO COUNTY SHERIFF, LIVE PD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and HEATH HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
