US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Labor Cases
Cases 181 - 190 of 483
SWANT v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
JAROD SWANT
Defendant:
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
REEVES v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.
as 3:2014cv00678
Plaintiff:
SHEILA REEVES
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and COX ENTERPRISES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
PAYNE v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv00661
Plaintiff:
TERRY L PAYNE
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
FRAZIER-STERN v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
as 4:2014cv00637
Plaintiff:
MARTIE FRAZIER-STERN
Defendant:
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
NOLET v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCECOMPANY OF BOSTON
as 3:2014cv00634
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE NOLET
Defendant:
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WEEKS v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 5:2014cv00288
Plaintiff:
TAMARA WEEKS
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ARTHURS v. SUNLIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 1:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
DONNA ARTHURS
Defendant:
SUNLIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
GAY v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2014cv00245
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CARY GAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EZEKIEL v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 5:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY EZEKIEL
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WILLIAMS v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 3:2014cv00503
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
