US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Labor Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 482
BLAKELY v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv00380
Plaintiff:
SHARON A BLAKELY
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WILLIAMS v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv00376
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
CARR v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2014cv00172
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
RHONDA CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
WILLIAMSON v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2014cv00324
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ERSKINE WILLIAMSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
GANIM v. LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP
as 4:2014cv00354
Plaintiff:
DARREN J GANIM
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BENTON v. CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
as 3:2014cv00280
Plaintiff:
BLAIR CHARLES BENTON
Defendant:
CIGNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MCLEAN v. CITY OF QUINCY FLORIDA et al
as 4:2014cv00265
Plaintiff:
JACK L MCLEAN, JR
Defendant:
CITY OF QUINCY FLORIDA , CITY OF QUINCY RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN and MICHAEL B WADE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
PRESCOTT v. COOPERATIVE BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS, INC.
as 4:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
LETRICIA M PRESCOTT
Defendant:
COOPERATIVE BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BUSBY v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
TERESA A BUSBY
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MIZELL v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
LISA MIZELL
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
