US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Labor Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 421
LAY v. STELLAR MANAGEMENT GROUP III, INC. et al
as 4:2020cv00141
Defendant:
KOCH FOODS OF ALABAMA LLC and STELLAR MANAGEMENT GROUP III INC
Plaintiff:
LINDSEY LAY
DANIEL v. GEORGIA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION INC et al
as 3:2020cv00066
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN DANIEL
Defendant:
JOSEPH HALE, GEORGIA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. and GEORGIA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
AVERY v. EXCEPTIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC et al
as 3:2020cv00065
Plaintiff:
Brandon Avery
Defendant:
kimberly locklin, Exceptional Community Services, Inc. and EXCEPTIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
BRYANT v. TOPPERS INTERNATIONAL INC et al
as 3:2020cv00061
Plaintiff:
QYNNISHA BRYANT
Defendant:
SANDRA GARDNER, TOPPERS INTERNATIONAL INC and DARNELL LEWIS GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HARRIS v. AMERICAN WORK, LLC
as 1:2020cv00094
Defendant:
AMERICANWORK LLC and AMERICANWORK INC
Plaintiff:
ARDRA HARRIS
HARRIS v. AMERICAN WORK, LLC
as 4:2020cv00107
Defendant:
AMERICANWORK LLC and AMERICANWORK INC
Plaintiff:
ARDRA HARRIS
SIMPKINS v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2020cv00082
Defendant:
COMPANION ANIMAL HOSPITAL and LEE-ANNE MITCHELL
Plaintiff:
SYDNEE SIMPKINS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SMITH et al v. MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
as 4:2020cv00080
Plaintiff:
JAMES K SMITH, CURTIS MCQUINN, GAYMON SAMPSON and others
Defendant:
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC
ALLEN et al v. WHITE OAK PASTURES INC
as 1:2020cv00060
Plaintiff:
EDDIE WESLEY, MORTON BRIMBERRY, CODY MILBURN and others
Defendant:
WHITE OAK PASTURES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hurt v. RT Pizza, Inc. d/b/a Domino's Pizza et al
as 7:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
JESSICA HURT
Defendant:
RT PIZZA INC and RICKY TEEL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
