US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Labor Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 439
BORUM v. CENGA COMPANY INC
as 5:2019cv00212
Defendant:
CENGA COMPANY INC
Plaintiff:
ROSELEE BORUM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
DAVIS v. HAWTHORNE RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS LLC
as 3:2019cv00051
Plaintiff:
TRINA DAVIS
Defendant:
HAWTHORNE RESIDENTIAL PARTNERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RANGEL v. PRECISION LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00047
Defendant:
CHAD M KELLER and PRECISION LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT LLC
Plaintiff:
DIEGO RANGEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CARTER et al v. SENIOR LIFE STYLES INC et al
as 5:2019cv00163
Defendant:
SENIOR LIFE STYLES INC and STEPHEN TYLER
Plaintiff:
DANEESE CARTER and JOHNTIEA FLUELLEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JONES v. MOFAZZAL SURAIYA LLC
as 3:2019cv00040
Plaintiff:
TASHEENA JONES
Defendant:
MOFAZZAL SURAIYA LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SHELTON v. BOBBY DODD INSTITUTE INC
as 4:2019cv00063
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY L SHELTON
Defendant:
BOBBY DODD INSTITUTE INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BEJINES-GONZALEZ et al v. HAMILTON GROWERS INC et al
as 7:2019cv00055
Defendant:
WK MEX PROPERTIES LP, SOUTHERN VALLEY FRUIT AND VEGETABLE INC, HAMILTON PRODUCE LP and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Bejines-Gonzalez, Abrahaam Sayago-Hernandez, LOIDA OSORIO-JIMENEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KENNINGTON v. HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC et al
as 1:2019cv00052
Defendant:
HARPER'S TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL INC and DONALD RANDOLPH HARPER
Plaintiff:
JAMIE KENNINGTON, JUAN URBINA, JR. and DARREN JASKULSKI
CENTER v. PARTS DISTRIBUTION XPRESS INC
as 5:2019cv00116
Defendant:
PARTS DISTRIBUTION EXPRESS INC
Plaintiff:
WALTER CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PERKINS v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 4:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
BRENDA PERKINS
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
