US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 271 - 280 of 1,729
Bogolub v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06528
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Bogolub
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fouts v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv50398
Plaintiff:
Larry A. Fouts
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Strand v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06491
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. Strand
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Namrod v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06449
Plaintiff:
Rita Namrod
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Koenig v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06420
Plaintiff:
Tamara Koenig
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tobin v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06412
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tobin
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Paulson v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv50394
Plaintiff:
Peggy Paulson
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bavone v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06356
Plaintiff:
Linda Bavone
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Huskic Moy v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06341
Plaintiff:
Ferida Huskic Moy
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
