US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 231 - 240 of 1,707
Gonzalez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07160
Plaintiff:
Francisco J. Lara Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wikstrom v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07150
Plaintiff:
Theodore Wikstrom
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sims v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07126
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Sims
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07143
Plaintiff:
Sue F. Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gormaz-Lemons v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07140
Plaintiff:
Jennyfer Gormaz-Lemons
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McKenna v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06958
Plaintiff:
Isabella A. McKenna
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Diaz v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06819
Plaintiff:
Bertha Diaz
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reyes v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06805
Plaintiff:
Angel Reyes
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Danielak v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06776
Plaintiff:
Kari A. Danielak
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pierce v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv06754
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Pierce
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
