US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 1,704
Vorhees v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv50077
Plaintiff:
Van K. Vorhees
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Weber v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
Robert Weber
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Givens v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Derrell Givens
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Perez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Maria Perez
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Luczynski v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Luczynski
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Szilagyi v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01021
Plaintiff:
Shelene T. Szilagyi
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Burke v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Burke
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Carrara v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Dean Carrara
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Duck v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
David J. Duck
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Buxton v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
John Buxton
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
