US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 221 - 230 of 1,707
Guadarrama v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07316
Plaintiff:
Juana Guadarrama
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Akbarshahi v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07320
Plaintiff:
Saman Akbarshahi
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kontak v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07296
Plaintiff:
Rosie Kontak
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lampkins v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07283
Plaintiff:
Annette Lampkins
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stone v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07291
Plaintiff:
Reid Stone
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Martin v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv50453
Plaintiff:
Todd R. Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tripenfeldas v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07245
Plaintiff:
Ryan Tripenfeldas
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hill v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07273
Plaintiff:
Nicole Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Partyka v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07206
Plaintiff:
Mary Therese Partyka
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Schaffer v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv07180
Plaintiff:
Robin C. Schaffer
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
