US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 762
Ruggeri Sarigu v. Bio-Medical Applications of Illinois, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04508
Plaintiff:
Cristiana Ruggeri Sarigu
Defendant:
Bio-Medical Applications of Illinois, Inc. and Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.
Hitchens v. Neuromonitoring Associates, LLC
as 1:2023cv04188
Plaintiff:
Mr. Rick Hitchens
Defendant:
Neuromonitoring Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Perez v. Gale Healthcare Solutions, LLC
as 1:2023cv03837
Plaintiff:
Sonia Perez and GALE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Thompson et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03717
Plaintiff:
Heaven Thompson, Christina Post and Morgan Benoit
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC and Amazon Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dantzler v. GoHealth, LLC
as 1:2023cv03611
Plaintiff:
Tyrah Dantzler
Defendant:
GoHealth, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Velazquez v. Jabil, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03406
Plaintiff:
Maria Felix Velazquez
Defendant:
Jabil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Sheppard v. Village of Robbins, Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv03360
Plaintiff:
David Sheppard
Defendant:
Village of Robbins, Illinois, Darren BRYANT and Village Of Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lambert v. Per Se Group, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02501
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lambert
Defendant:
Per Se Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bazinett v. Pregis LLC
as 1:2023cv02246
Plaintiff:
Lori Bazinett
Defendant:
Pregis LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Tiram v. EStyle Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01897
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tiram
Defendant:
EStyle Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
