Illinois Contract Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 288
Robert Berg v. Akorn, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05016
Plaintiff:
Robert Berg
Defendant:
Akorn, Inc. , John N. Kapoor , Kenneth S. Abramowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Jorge Alcarez v. Akorn, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv05017
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alcarez
Defendant:
Akorn, Inc. , Kenneth S. Abramowitz , Adrienne L. Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Robert Carlyle v. Akorn, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv05022
Plaintiff:
Robert Carlyle
Defendant:
Akorn, Inc. , John N. Kapoor , Kenneth S. Abramowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Pullos v. Akorn, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv05026
Plaintiff:
Demetrios Pullos
Defendant:
Akorn, Inc. , John N. Kapoor , Kenneth S. Abramowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
House v. Akorn, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05018
Plaintiff:
Shaun A. House
Defendant:
Akorn, Inc. , John N. Kapoor , Kenneth S. Abramowitz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Palkon v. Berglass et al
as 1:2017cv03233
Plaintiff:
Dennis Palkon
Defendant:
Robert Berglass, Christopher W. Shean, Robin S. Hickenlooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atallah v. Apatoff et al
as 1:2017cv02773
Plaintiff:
Nabil Atallah
Defendant:
Robert S. Apatoff, Christopher W. Shean, Becky A. Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lazarev v. American Medical Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02673
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Lazarev
Defendant:
American Medical Technologies, Inc., AmeriMed Holdings Inc. and Jeffery Michael Drizin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Ellis v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2017cv02638
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ellis
Defendant:
Richard A. Gonzalez, Robert J. Alpern, Roxanne S. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Petri et al v. GeaCom, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02579
Plaintiff:
Chris Petri , Yi Lu Lu , Keith Petri and others
Defendant:
GeaCom, Inc. , Mat Johnson and Ralph Romano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
