U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,060
Adams v. USA
as 1:2025cv00294
Petitioner:
Patrick N Adams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Beamon v. USA
as 1:2025cv00267
Petitioner:
William D Beamon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Randle v. USA
as 1:2025cv00248
Petitioner:
Payne T Randle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez v. USA
as 1:2025cv00218
Petitioner:
Juan M Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sanabria v. USA
as 1:2025cv00215
Petitioner:
Tito Sanabria
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Young v. USA
as 3:2025cv00334
Petitioner:
Tony E Young
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Winston v. USA
as 3:2025cv00323
Petitioner:
Cartell Odom Winston
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. USA
as 3:2025cv00324
Petitioner:
Marcus Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Penaloza v. USA
as 1:2025cv00164
Petitioner:
Alejandro Lagunas Penaloza
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tinker v. USA
as 1:2025cv00119
Petitioner:
Ronday L. Tinker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
