US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 36
KENDALL v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2013cv02037
Respondent:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Petitioner:
DONNA FAYE KENDALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
WOODWARD v. ALGIE et al
as 1:2013cv01435
Defendant:
DAVID ALGIE and LINDA ALGIE
Plaintiff:
LOYD WOODWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS & ALLIED TRADES, DISTRICT COUNCIL 91 v. METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS & ALLIED TRADES, DISTRICT COUNCIL 91
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WARREN TOWNSHIP
Intervenor Defendant:
SHEPHERD PROPERTIES CO.
Interpleader:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Miller v. Zimmer, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Matthew Miller
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
MASCO CORPORATION v. PROSTYAKOV
as 1:2009cv00500
Plaintiff:
MASCO CORPORATION and MASCO CORPORATION
Defendant:
PETER A. PROSTYAKOV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARNES et al
as 1:2008cv01690
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STEVE R. BARNES, JOANNE B. BARNES, BARNES REAL ESTATE, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
MICROMETL CORP. v. TRANZACT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 1:2008cv00321
Plaintiff:
MICROMETL CORP. and MICROMETL CORP.
Defendant:
TRANZACT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TRANZACT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and TRANZACT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KRAMARENKO
as 1:2007cv01549
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ERIC L. KRAMARENKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ZAPFE
as 1:2007cv00859
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN ZAPFE
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 3116 VA Overpayment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
