US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 467
COOK PRODUCTIONS LLC v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2016cv03158
Plaintiff:
COOK PRODUCTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
DOE 1, DOE 10, DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. HOOSIER DADDY'S NCIN, LLC
as 1:2016cv03022
Plaintiff:
BOY ROCKING MUSIC, BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., CHINQUAPIN MUSIC and others
Defendant:
JEFF S. BURCHETT and HOOSIER DADDY'S NCIN LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2016cv03020
Defendant:
DOE 1, DOE 2, DOE 3 and others
Plaintiff:
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2016cv02758
Defendant:
DOE 1, DOE 10, DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2016cv02757
Defendant:
DOE 1, DOE 2, DOE 3 and others
Plaintiff:
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. HONEY CREEK CAPITAL, LLC
as 1:2016cv02749
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
HONEY CREEK CAPITAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. CHERF
as 1:2016cv02571
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
CINDY CHERF
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. ODLE MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC
as 1:2016cv02573
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
ODLE MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. A1 LUXURY LIMOUSINE OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
as 1:2016cv02536
Defendant:
A1 LUXURY LIMOUSINE OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
BELL v. HORNBERGER IMPORTS, INC.
as 1:2016cv02501
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
HORNBERGER IMPORTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
