US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 7,841
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC v. CDG ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC
Defendant:
CDG ENTERPRISES, LLC doing business as 5TH AVENUE GRILL & BAR, JEFFREY DEES, JOSHUA GOODIN and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful Reception Broadcast Signal i.e., Satellite Comm.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL. ROKITA v. APRIA HEALTHCARE LLC
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL. ROKITA
Defendant:
APRIA HEALTHCARE LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Teague et al v. Kia America, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Brandon Teague and Tara Teague
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
