US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,514
SANDERS v. HOOK-SUPERX INC. d/b/a CVS
as 1:2023cv02124
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. SANDERS
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX, LLC D/B/A CVS PHARMACY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DENHART v. HIKMATULLOEV et al
as 4:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
VICKI DENHART
Defendant:
HIKMATULLO HIKMATULLOEV and SKYLAND FREIGHT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ARECHE v. INDIANAPOLIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS et al
as 1:2023cv02116
Plaintiff:
ELIEZER ARECHE
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, DOE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ROGGE v. WAL-MART
as 3:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Rogge
Defendant:
WAL-MART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HUDDLESTON v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2023cv02051
Plaintiff:
JOAN HUDDLESTON
Defendant:
KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RICE v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I
as 1:2023cv02042
Plaintiff:
PATRICK RICE
Defendant:
KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MCNEILL v. MCCLAIN et al.
as 2:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
MISTY R. MCNEILL
Defendant:
JOSEPH D. MCCLAIN and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
MAHURIN v. CVS HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLC et al.
as 1:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
MARY MAHURIN
Defendant:
HOOK-SUPERX, LLC D/B/A CVS PHARMACY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TEATER v. MENARD, INC.
as 1:2023cv02014
Plaintiff:
PEGGY TEATER
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KEENAN v. CARESOURCE, CORP. et al
as 1:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
WYATT KEENAN
Defendant:
CARESOURCE, CORP. and CARESOURCE INDIANA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
