U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 197
MOORE v. INDIANA UNIVERITY HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2025cv00193
Plaintiff:
RAEVEN MOORE
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
BEARD et al v. GRAMMER LOGISTICS, INC.
as 1:2024cv02240
Plaintiff:
ALLEN STEMBRIDGE and DAQUAN BEARD
Defendant:
GRAMMER LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 91 v. MAC INDUSTRIAL
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 91
Defendant:
MAC Industrial
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
HAMPTON v. WEIS et al
as 4:2024cv00158
Defendant:
BRIAN WEIS, ROSS DIMAGGIO and P. KELLEY DUNNE
Plaintiff:
JASON HAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
DAVIS v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC.
as 1:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
MADISON DAVIS
Defendant:
WAFFLE HOUSE, INC. and MIDWEST WAFFLES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LONE v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LONE
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sipes
as 1:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
William Russell Sipes
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
GLENN v. JAVELINA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
JASON GLENN
Defendant:
JAVELINA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
WAGNER v. LANDAIR TRANSPORT, INC
as 1:2023cv02028
Plaintiff:
NATHAN WAGNER
Defendant:
LANDAIR TRANSPORT, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
RICHARDSON v. CITY OF MARTINSVILLE et al
as 1:2023cv01701
Plaintiff:
NATHAN RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CITY OF MARTINSVILLE and JOHN RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) - Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
