Louisiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 181 - 190 of 288
Giroir v. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission
as 2:2011cv01233
Plaintiff:
Dean C Giroir
Defendant:
New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Quebedeaux v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2011cv01088
Plaintiff:
Terry Quebedeaux
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lanus v. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission
as 2:2011cv00973
Plaintiff:
Clark R Lanus
Defendant:
New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Bowie v. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad
as 2:2011cv00755
Plaintiff:
Sean Bowie
Defendant:
New Orleans Public Belt Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Brand v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00667
Plaintiff:
Michael T Brand
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. and Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Jackson v. Public Belt Railroad Commission of the City of New Orleans
as 2:2011cv00542
Plaintiff:
Lamont Jackson
Defendant:
Public Belt Railroad Commission of the City of New Orleans
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lymuel v. New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission
as 2:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Juan Lymuel
Defendant:
New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ryan v. United States Postmaster General et al
as 3:2010cv00830
Plaintiff:
Kristian M. Ryan
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States Postmaster General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
White v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv03067
Plaintiff:
Charlotte N. White
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Herbert v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
as 2:2010cv03048
Plaintiff:
Gail Z. Herbert
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
