District of Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 7,070
Recasner v. Tanner et al
as 2:2017cv02220
Plaintiff: Joshua Recasner
Defendant: Robert Tanner
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Johnson
as 2:2017cv00394
Plaintiff: Max Ray Butler
Defendant: Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Powell v. Tanner
as 2:2017cv02123
Plaintiff: William D. Powell
Defendant: Robert Tanner
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony v. Johnson
as 1:2017cv00365
Plaintiff: Richard Anthony
Defendant: Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Christof v. Cain et al
as 3:2017cv00131
Respondent: Nathan Burl Cain, Jeffery Landry, Hilar C. Moore, Jr.
Petitioner: Hennessy Christof
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bridges v. Tanner
as 2:2017cv01925
Plaintiff: Dwight Bridges
Defendant: Robert Tanner
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Deville et al
as 5:2017cv00341
Plaintiff: David Theodore Ward, Jr
Defendant: Deville, State of Louisiana, Winnfield Corrections
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tryon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv00339
Plaintiff: William Henry Tryon
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. Barnhart
as 1:2017cv00335
Plaintiff: Darrell Wayne Collins
Defendant: J A Barnhart
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pete v. Tanner et al
as 2:2017cv01802
Plaintiff: Norman Pete
Defendant: Robert Tanner
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?