US District Court for the District of Maine Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 50
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KIMBALL et al
as 2:2014cv00521
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN H KIMBALL, JR, KIMBALL FAMILY TRUST and BIRCH ROAD COUNTRY HOMES
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
USA et al v. DENNER et al
as 2:2014cv00414
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
JEFFREY A DENNER, CITIMORTGAGE INC, STATE OF MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
USA v. RYDER et al
as 2:2014cv00404
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
ROBERT W RYDER and SUZANNE G RYDER
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
USA v. HARDISON et al
as 1:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
TODD A HARDISON, SUE E HARDISON, CAMDEN NATIONAL BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
USA v. SWANTON et al
as 2:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
GREGORY A SWANTON and 63 ENGLISH RANGE ROAD LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
USA v. AMES et al
as 2:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
NOAH K AMES, HARDWAY INC, LEEANNE AMES and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
USA v. ST GERMAIN
as 1:2013cv00142
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
DAVID M ST GERMAIN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
ROBINSON et al v. HENDERSHOT et al
as 2:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
DAVID E ROBINSON and F WILLIAM MESSIER
Defendant:
JOLINE P HENDERSHOT , JASON S ROGERS and PATRICK FRIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
MESSIER et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE et al
as 2:2012cv00320
Plaintiff:
F WILLIAM MESSIER, DAVID E ROBINSON, MAINE REPUBLIC FREE STATE and others
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE , DOUGLAS H SHULMAN , INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
USA v. WINCHENBACH et al
as 2:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
SCOT W WINCHENBACH, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DAMARISCOTTA, CAMDEN NATIONAL BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
