US District Court for the District of Maine Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,166
SHUTE v. PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 1:2024cv00447
Defendant:
ROBIN HUISMAN, SHARI SHUTE, ROBERT MCKEE and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SHUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PADUANI
as 1:2024cv00439
Defendant:
JAZMYN PADUANI
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AVERY
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTOINETTE AVERY
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VANGEL
as 2:2024cv00440
Defendant:
DEVIN VANGEL
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
IN RE: STEPHEN RODRIGUE
as 2:2024cv00433
Unknown:
STEPHEN RODRIGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CURTIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
ANDREW C CURTIN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, PECOS RIVER TALC LLC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ARENDELL v. WALGREEN EASTERN CO INC
as 2:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
TERESA ARENDELL
Defendant:
WALGREEN EASTERN CO INC doing business as WALGREENS STORE 19188
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PATRICK v. KUBETZ
as 1:2024cv00397
Defendant:
BERNEY J KUBETZ
Plaintiff:
SUSAN N PATRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WRIGHT v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH E WRIGHT
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP doing business as WAL-MART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ESTATE OF TESSA HAUSER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00391
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF TESSA HAUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
