U.S. District Court for the District of Maine Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 94
BURN v. SEAPORT NAVIGATION COMPANY INC
as 2:2025cv00306
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BURN
Defendant:
SEAPORT NAVIGATION COMPANY INC doing business as SCHOONER AMERICAN EAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LASH v. DELANO et al
as 2:2025cv00269
Plaintiff:
DAVID LASH
Defendant:
WAYNE DELANO, GOOSE RIVER LOBSTER INC and F/V WISHFUL THINKING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PROGRESSIVE NORTHWESTERN INS CO v. SPEECHES
as 2:2025cv00045
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE NORTHWESTERN INS CO
Defendant:
PETER SPEECHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
IN RE: STEPHEN RODRIGUE
as 2:2024cv00433
Unknown:
STEPHEN RODRIGUE
Claimant:
PETER SPEECHES
Counter-Claimant:
PETER SPEECHES
Counter-Defendant:
STEPHEN RODRIGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RICHEY v. AMERICAN CRUISE LINES, INC.
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
ELAINE RICHEY
Defendant:
AMERICAN CRUISE LINES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
GEE v. BAR HARBOR WHALE WATCH CO
as 1:2024cv00327
Defendant:
BAR HARBOR WHALE WATCH CO
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE GEE
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
HARPER et al v. TAVENNER
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
LINDA HARPER and ANTHONY HARPER
Defendant:
THOMAS TAVENNER, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOUGHTY v. SIMPLE PLEASURES LOBSTER INC et al
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOUGHTY
Defendant:
SIMPLE PLEASURES LOBSTER INC and GARY HAWKES, JR
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
RANGARAJU v. AMERICAN QUEEN VOYAGES et al
as 2:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
DINESHRAJ RANGARAJU
Defendant:
AMERICAN QUEEN VOYAGES, ANGLO-EASTERN CRUISE MANAGEMENT INC, HORNBLOWER GROUP INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
HORR v. BAMD INC
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
TORY HORR
Defendant:
BAMD INC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
