Maine Other Statutes Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 228
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY et al v. MONTREAL MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY LTD
as 1:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY and WATERLOO RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
MONTREAL MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY LTD
Intervenor_plaintiff:
TWIN RIVERS PAPER COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STRONG ELECTRIC v. TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 1:2010cv00448
Plaintiff:
STRONG ELECTRIC
Defendant:
TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY, TECUMSEH COMPRESSOR COMPANY, TECUMSEH DO BRASIL LTDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAGNE v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS INC et al
as 2:2010cv00441
Plaintiff:
NICKOLE GAGNE
Defendant:
DICK'S SPORTING GOODS INC , GALYAN'S TRADING COMPANY INC , EDWARD STACK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THAYER CORPORATION v. REED
as 2:2010cv00423
Plaintiff:
THAYER CORPORATION
Defendant:
DAVID REED
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
MERCHANT v. ZENITH ACQUISITION CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv00419
Plaintiff:
HERBERT MERCHANT
Defendant:
ZENITH ACQUISITION CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PORTER v. LAW OFFICES OF BRACHFELD AND ASSOCIATES
as 1:2010cv00380
Plaintiff:
REGINALD PORTER
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF BRACHFELD AND ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CHARALAMBOUS v. CHARALAMBOUS
as 2:2010cv00375
Petitioner:
SAVVAS CHARALAMBOUS
Respondent:
ELIZABETH ROHNERT CHARALAMBOUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN INC v. MAINE BUREAU OF INSURANCE
as 1:2010cv00322
Plaintiff:
ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN INC
Defendant:
MAINE BUREAU OF INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MARINER TOWER II LLC et al v. TOPSHAM, TOWN OF et al
as 2:2010cv00314
Plaintiff:
MARINER TOWER II LLC and T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC
Defendant:
TOPSHAM, TOWN OF and TOPSHAM PLANNING BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAINE RSA #1 INC v. ALBION, TOWN OF
as 1:2010cv00279
Plaintiff:
MAINE RSA #1 INC
Defendant:
ALBION, TOWN OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
